Last Updated: 30th September, 2019
Malware Flux: Cybersecurity has recently developed a lot, particularly from a software perspective. For personal use of corporate cybersecurity, the entire sector has developed dramatically over the previous couple of years and has improved. While this may sound positive, it needs to be pointed out how much the whole hacking scene has also evolved.
Hacking in 2019, especially when done for architectural testing (the procedure, to reference, which many software developers use to test if their architectures are safe to use and “unreachable“) has also evolved massively, with more and more “tricks” which are scaring a vast variety of cybersecurity-based architectures. One of the most advanced and popular procedures in today’s hacking world is malware flux.
What’s Malware Flux?
Malware has always been a problem in the cybersecurity world. The fact that cybersecurity has been relying on a software-based architectures (ranging from firewalls to everything in between) and that cybersecurity architectures are built in easily accessible languages like C++ and SQL have given massive advantages to hackers who were building pieces of malware.
Malware flux is a relatively simple procedure which basically “hides” the malware in two waves of Trojans. As many of you may know, Trojans aren’t necessarily stopped by cybersecurity architectures, but mainly just isolated until the internal clocking engine associates them with other particular threats.
Malware Flux: In Simpler Terms
Although this may sound frightening, it is relatively easy to understand the Malware Flux’s process. Visualize an attack like an onion on Malware Flux: the very first layer, usually the dirtiest, is a massive spyware block (reference programs specifically targeted at stealing personal data, i.e., bank account information, etc.), which will keep a hypothetical anti-virus occupied for ages, whilst the purest layers (where the malware is actually stored) could penetrate the machine.
This practice is very similar to a DDoS attack, where multiple packages of data are being fired over to a server within an extremely short timeframe, to crash the internal clocking of the machine.
How To Identify Malware Flux When This Is Happening
Although it may seem complicated, the best way to identify whether or not a malware flux script is being applied to some Trojans is by using targeted software/scripts which are using “dissection-related procedures.” If you’re relatively familiar with the programming languages normally used for building such viruses (mainly C++ and Java, two of the most common software programming languages), you’ll know that, being objects-related languages, it’s possible to debug them by using easy to learn tools which are identifying each object and property within the software.
Installing a debugging tool in a cybersecurity software is obligatory, given that malware fluxes are generally crunched into tiny archives hidden in Trojans, as this will classify in which the malware is that when it approaches the device of the client.
Why Object-Related Languages?
Object-related languages are those languages which operate with dynamic factors: imagine a Lego tower in which every single block automatically changes to a set of rules you give to it. That’s basically the same thing which happens within objects-based programming languages.
With this in mind, if you analyze a virus (whether if malware or spyware), once you identify which block tells the others what to do, you will find a way to stop it from doing it as well. That’s why many cybersecurity architectures and software should be looking for it actively and thoroughly.
How To Block Malware Flux From Approaching Complex Server-based Architectures
As pointed above, in order to block any form of malware flux from happening, it’s important to update native pieces of software with a dedicated debugging section, in order to understand (at a coding level) whether or not the software is isolating a Trojan or ransomware.
The identification of a potential software threat, with its connected removal, is indeed mandatory for the success of a cybersecurity software architecture. If you’re a developer, objectification within software debugging is (in 2019, in particular) mandatory.
Although malware flux is an extremely complex and code-related matter, it’s safe to say that proper development shrewdnesses will most likely isolate, identify and (hopefully) exterminate a cybersecurity matter which is scaring companies.